Free the Freelancers
What’s the best way to protect the rights of workers? Let them determine their own job preferences, or mandate that companies provide them with certain protections? California has chosen to take the latter path. Has it worked? Is it a victory for workers, or a debilitating defeat? Patrice Onwuka of the Independent Women’s Forum looks into these questions. Her findings may surprise you.
For more information on Independent Women's Forum, go to iwf.org/AB5
The former union boss who authored AB5 is _____________________________.
Assemblywoman Christina GarciaAssemblywoman Lorena GonzalezAssemblywoman Eloise Gomez ReyesAssemblywoman Luz RivasWhat was the stated goal of AB5?
to protect employers from exploitive freelance workersto protect employers from unfair government regulationto protect freelance workers from employers taking advantage of themto protect freelance workers from disagreeable customers12 million Californians are freelance workers.
TrueFalseOf the 57 million Americans who freelance, what percentage are women?
6%16%26%46%As a result of AB5, ride-sharing customers will face _______________________.
longer wait timesfewer available rideshigher pricesAll of the above
- California’s anti-freelancer bill AB5 has resulted in fewer jobs and fewer people employed.
In September 2019, the Democrat-controlled California legislature passed Assembly Bill 5 (AB5) with the stated goal of protecting freelance workers from employers that are supposedly taking advantage of them. Supporters of the bill claim that gig economy firms, like Uber and Lyft, willfully misclassify workers as freelancers to avoid providing benefits.
View sourceAbout 2 million Californians are self-employed or independent contractors.
View sourceDozens of industries and trade groups lobbied for and won carve-outs before the ill-conceived bill was passed to ensure it didn’t affect them.
View sourceInstead of protecting freelance workers, however, the bill quickly pushed thousands of them into unemployment.
View sourceThe ant-freelance bill was authored by Assemblywoman Lorena Gonzalez, a former union boss. Gonzalez infamously expressed her disdain for freelance gigs, saying, “These were never good jobs.”
View source- Among the groups whose livelihoods are threatened by California’s AB5 are rideshare drivers and freelance writers & journalists.
The ride-sharing industry estimates that AB5 will increase their labor costs by 20–30%.
View sourceAs a result, rideshare companies may schedule drivers in advance and reduce the number of drivers during slow hours or in less busy markets. For customers, this means longer wait times, fewer available rides, and higher prices. For drivers, it means reduced flexibility and reduced income. It may also kill as many as 900,000 jobs.
View sourceUber, Lyft and DoorDash have sponsored a November ballot initiative to exempt them from AB5.
View sourceAB5 has particularly hurt the livelihood of freelance writers and journalists by making it illegal for them to produce more than 35 pieces of content in a year for a single company.
View sourceIn September 2019, left-leaning Vox Media hailed the bill’s passage as “a victory for workers everywhere.”
View sourceWithin months of praising the bill, Vox Media laid off 200 freelance writers rather than make them full-time employees.
View source- Over a third of Americans have freelance jobs—and that percentage is rapidly growing.
Over a third (36%) of U.S. workers are now involved in the freelance, or gig, economy.
View sourceAccording to Upwork statistics, the gig economy is expanding three times faster than the U.S. working population overall. By 2027, an estimated 50% of the U.S. workforce will participate to some degree in freelance work.
View sourceA 2019 study found that in 2018 some 57 million Americans had freelance jobs, which accounted for nearly $1 trillion in income.
View sourceIn 2019, about 46% of freelancers in the U.S. were women.
View source- An overwhelming majority of freelancers say they’re happier than those working traditional jobs and make more money independently.
According to a recent McKinsey study, 78% of gig workers said they were happier than those working traditional jobs. The gig workers said that they appreciate their freedom and that they earn a good living.
View sourceA study by Freelancers Union and Upwork in 2017, found that 17.2 million freelancers quit their traditional job to freelance and two out of three of them say they earn more now than before.
View sourceThe vast majority of gig workers say their new freelance incomes outpaced their previous salary within just one year.
View sourceHalf of freelancers surveyed in 2015 said they would not take a traditional job no matter how much they were offered.
View sourceNearly two out of three women (61%) who have a side gig prefer being independent contractors over being employees.
View source- Several states are considering their own versions of California’s job-killing AB5, while House Democrats are trying to nationalize it.
New Jersey, New York, Illinois, Wisconsin, and Oregon are all considering AB5-style legislation.
View sourceThe Democrats in the U.S. House of Representatives passed the PRO Act in February 2020, which would adopt AB5’s harsh classification standard nationwide and strengthen unions.
View sourceRelated reading: “The Fight Against AB5 Marches On” – Patrice Onwuka & Jim Manley
View source
Workers of the world unite—to protect your freedom.
You have nothing to lose, but your jobs...
Which is exactly what is happening in California.
And threatening to spread to the rest of the country.
Just what we need, right?
Fewer jobs and fewer people employed.
Why is this happening?
Exhibit A:
Assembly Bill 5 or AB5, as it’s commonly known.
Passed by the California legislature in September of 2019, AB5 was authored by a former union boss Assemblywoman Lorena Gonzalez. The stated goal was to protect freelance workers from employers taking advantage of them. Instead, it has pushed thousands of these workers into the unemployment line.
Here’s why:
Workers in the United States are classified as either employees or independent contractors, sometimes known as freelancers.
Independent contractors are self-employed and contract their labor to one or more firms. The upsides to this arrangement are clear: Freelancers decide whom they work for, when, where, and how. They are their own boss.
So, then, what are employees?
Employees typically work for one employer. In exchange, they are entitled to workplace benefits and protections that independent contractors are not — such as healthcare, time off, minimum wage, and unemployment insurance.
We don’t have to agree which kind of employment is better. Different people have different preferences. It’s called choice.
But some people — specifically, unions and progressive politicians—are anti-choice.
AB5’s author Assemblywomen Gonzalez disdains freelance work. “These were never good jobs,” she says.
Oh really?
She might want to talk to some of the 2 million Californians or the 57 million Americans who freelance. 46% of those workers happen to be women.
Of course, the AB5 supporters would say the law is needed because companies, especially gig economy firms such as Uber and Lyft, willfully misclassify workers as freelancers to avoid providing benefits.
Why not ask the workers themselves?
Well, pollsters have.
According to a McKinsey study, nearly 80% of gig workers say they’re happier than those working traditional jobs. They love their freedom and also earn a good living. In fact, over 17 million freelancers quit their traditional job to freelance and two out of three of them say they earn more now than before.
For the majority, their new incomes outpaced their previous salary within just one year.
Half of the freelancers say they would not take a traditional job no matter how much they were offered.
And, in a survey of female gig workers, nearly two out of three women who have a side job prefer being independent contractors over being employees.
AB5 has already done damage. It has wiped out the livelihoods of many independent contractors and will limit new opportunities in the future.
Freelance writers and journalists have been especially hurt. The law includes a provision making it illegal for them to produce more than 35 pieces of content in a year for a single company.
Left-leaning Vox Media hailed the bill’s passage as “a victory for workers everywhere” then turned around and laid off 200 freelance writers rather than make them full-time employees.
The ride-sharing industry estimates that AB5 will increase their labor costs by 20–30%. As a result, rideshare companies may schedule drivers in advance and reduce the number of drivers during slow hours or in less busy markets. For customers, this means longer wait times, fewer available rides, and higher prices. For drivers, it means reduced flexibility and reduced income. It may also kill hundreds of thousands of jobs.
From its inception, AB5 was fundamentally flawed. Dozens of industries and trade groups lobbied for and won carve-outs before the bill was passed to ensure it didn’t affect them. But special carve-outs are not the way to fix bad policy. That approach only rewards those who can afford to pay for special treatment and punishes those who can’t.
Legislative attempts to overturn AB5 have failed. Not surprising given the influence the unions have over California politics. Court challenges have been filed and are ongoing. But legal action takes time, and hardships are immediate.
This would all be bad enough if it were just a California problem, but New Jersey, New York, Illinois, Wisconsin, and Oregon are all considering AB5-style legislation.
Although AB5 is positioned as progressive policy, there’s nothing progressive about what it does. It’s backward, not forward-looking. Flexibility, freedom, and opportunity is the bright future of the American worker — unless bad policies like AB5 get in the way.
I’m Patrice Onwuka, senior policy analyst at the Independent Women’s Forum, for Prager University.
Stay up to date on our latest releases
PragerU is changing the minds of millions worldwide. Help us keep our videos FREE!
Help support our mission
To make a donation over the phone, call (833) PragerU
At $35 or more you’ll be a PragerUnited Member
- Free merch every quarter
- Insider updates
- Free Annual Membership Sticker
Prager University is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit, Tax ID: 27-1763901. Your contribution is fully tax-deductible in the USA.