Brexit: Why Britain Left the European Union

Mar 12, 2018

Is the European Union good for Europe? Or would Europeans be better off without it? Nigel Farage, a leader of the United Kingdom's Brexit movement, shares his view.

The EU Parliament has no real power. The only people who can propose or reform EU law are members of the unelected European Commission. 

  • The EU is a multinational government that exerts control over the governments of Europe. The only people who can propose or reform EU law are members of the unelected EU Commission.View Source
  • “The EU is fond of citing the enormous volume of law – the aquis communautaire – that nations are forced to adopt before they can join the Union,” writes U.S.-European relations expert Theodore R. Brommund. “But at heart, the EU’s institutions are not law-bound: they are political, and their aim is always to advance the cause of ever-closer Union.”View Source
  • Related reading: “7 Reasons Why Some Europeans Hate The E.U.” – The Washington PostView Source
  • WATCH: Nigel Farage on the failures of the EU.View Source

The EU is bloated, slow, and inefficient. Example: It wastes hundreds of millions of dollars a year moving its parliament every month. 

  • The EU has not created wealth, only tried to fix the economic problems it has created.View Source
  • The EU wastes hundreds of million a year moving their parliament back and forth from Brussels to Strasbourg every month.View Source
  • The EU spends over $8 million a year on translation services.View Source
  • The members of the EU’s bureaucracy are well-paid and pay special tax rates, shielding them from the economic problems member countries face.View Source
  • WATCH: Nigel Farage on the “failing” and “dying” EU.View Source

The EU’s overly burdensome regulations have particularly harmed small businesses, who don’t have the money or influence to compete.

  • The EU’s burdensome regulations impact smaller businesses the most because they have less money to meet requirements and lobby the EU, while larger companies have worked with the EU for more accommodating policies.View Source
  • How burdensome and intrusive have the EU’s policies been? The EU imposed regulations on Britain that specified how bent a banana could be.View Source
  • The EU has controlled the fishing industry in most of British territorial waters to devastating effect for many local fisherman.View Source

Being against the EU is not “anti-trade.” The EU is not truly a free trade area: It’s a managed market. 

  • “There’s no question that free trade in Europe has been an enormous boon to Europe and to the world,” writes U.S.-European relations expert Theodore R. Brommund. “But the EU is not a free trade area: it is a managed market, many of whose members share a common currency. But as the Financial Times has remarked, the Euro was ‘unnecessary for economic convergence, if not actively harmful.’ Many of the Euro’s members did not meet the conditions for belonging to it. The pretense that they did, followed by the measures adopted to keep them in the currency union, has caused enormous suffering: Greece’s depression today, for example, is worse than the US Great Depression of the 1930s. The EU is not promoting prosperity: it is scrambling to keep up with the catastrophes that its own misguided policies are causing.”View Source
  • Related reading: “The European Anti-Trade Sentiment: A Fallacy Not A Fact” – Marten’s CentreView Source
  • Related reading: “7 Reasons Why Some Europeans Hate The E.U.” – The Washington PostView Source

The economic benefits of the EU are undermined by its massive bureaucracy, intrusive regulations and flawed immigration policies. 

  • Benefits of the EU’s trade zone are lessened by massive bureaucracy and regulations.View Source
  • One of the biggest points of criticism of the EU is its immigration policies, which have resulted in a migration crisis that has hurt many European countries economically.View Source
  • Related reading: “The Top Ten US Myths About The European Union” – Heritage FoundationView Source
  • Related video: Nigel Farage on the damaging policies of the EUView Source

The EU’s policies benefit big banks and big businesses, while overburdening small businesses with regulations. 

  • The EU mostly benefits big banks and big companies, not the middle class. The EU’s burdensome regulations impact smaller businesses the most because they have less money to meet requirements as well as to lobby their interests, while larger companies have the capacity to address regulations and work with the EU for more accommodating policies.View Source
  • One particularly controversial example is the EU’s regulation of British territorial waters, which included imposing industry-crushing quotas on British fisherman.View Source
  • Related reading: “UK to ‘Take Back Control’ of Waters After Exiting Fishing Convention” – The GuardianView Source
  • Related reading: “7 Reasons Why Some Europeans Hate The E.U.” – The Washington PostView Source

If one big government is bad, imagine how much worse two big governments would be. But that’s what people living in Europe have had to deal with: their own nation’s bloated government and the super-national government of Europe, now known as the European Union. Bureaucracy times two! How’s that for a horror show?

Well, actually, you’ve no idea. It’s worse than you think. Believe me—I know, because for seventeen years, I’ve represented South East England as a member of the European Parliament, the EU’s legislative body. I was also leader of the UK Independence Party, or UKIP, where I lead Britain’s efforts to leave the European Union. To their everlasting credit, that’s just what happened on June the 23rd, 2016: The United Kingdom left the European Union. The world knows it as “Brexit.”

Brexit is a statement of national sovereignty. Don’t misunderstand me: I like nations. I like borders. I like the people that live within those borders making their own laws. But I don’t like it when faceless bureaucrats make laws for nations they don’t even live in.

But that’s what they do in the European Union.

Imagine a Belgian telling a Brit how much he can charge his customers—or the reverse. The EU bureaucrats do this in a myriad of different ways, all day, every day. It is a conspiracy of the elites.

Who are those elites? Well, they’re a bunch of self-important, overpaid, social engineers with useless college degrees who have never done a proper day’s work in their lives and have no connection with ordinary, decent people. I’ll take the good sense of an Italian farmer or a French baker over the arid intellectualism of an EU bureaucrat any day.

And I say these things not as an anti-European; I love Europe! It’s a fantastic, exciting, great continent: different peoples, languages, and cultures. But these peoples, with their languages and cultures, have effectively been hijacked by a giant, ever-expanding bureaucracy: the European Union.

People will say, “but isn’t there a parliament, a European parliament, that represents the people of Europe?” Well, yes, but this body has got no real power; it can’t make its own laws. Rather, the power resides with the European Commission. They’re unelected and they can’t be removed, and that’s how absurd the whole thing is.

The European Parliament meets in Brussels. At least, that’s what I thought when I was elected there. But once a month, do you know what happens? They load the contents of our offices and papers into big, plastic trunks, and they put those trunks on lorries, and they drive them nearly 400 miles down Europe’s motorways to a French city called Strasbourg where, for four days, the contents of our offices, and our papers, are put into a new office, and the parliament then sits there. Twelve times a year this back-and-forth happens, and this from an organization who say they want to reduce their level of carbon footprint! This, from an organization whose accounts have not been given a clean bill of health by the auditors for the last twenty years!

This…a parliament? It’s more like a traveling circus.

Now, all of Europe knows that it’s costing nearly €300 million every year to move this back and forth from Brussels to Strasbourg, so why isn’t it reformed? Well, the way the EU has been structured, to change that would require changing the treaties, and to change the treaties would need all 28 member governments to agree not to go to Strasbourg twelve times a year. And do you know something? The French are never going to agree to that, ‘cause it’s in their economic interests for the traveling circus to go to Strasbourg. And it shows you that a system of law-making has been devised where not only can the voters not change anything, but the institutions themselves are pretty much incapable of reform.

Unfortunately, this is no laughing matter. Let me give you an example my countrymen know only too well.

The United Kingdom is an island; it’s surrounded by the sea, and yet, as members of the European Union, we were only allowed to catch 20% of the fish swimming in territorial British waters. What that meant was tens of thousands of jobs were lost in Britain’s coastal communities as we effectively gave away the ability to look after one of our greatest resources to a bureaucracy based in Brussels. No wonder we left the EU.

Again, I have nothing against Europe; quite the opposite. I want good relations between all the European nations. I want prosperous, free, and fair trade between those nations. But I’ll be damned if I’m going to give up my rights as a British citizen so that some Eurocrat can tell me how to live.

I won’t do it, and I’m certain that across the continent, ultimately, the French and the Italians won’t put up with it either.

I’m Nigel Farage for Prager University.

Download a PDF of this Transcript

PragerU is changing the minds of millions worldwide.Help us keep our videos FREE!

More 5-Minute Ideas

Did FDR End the Great Depression?


Don't Compare Yourself to Others


The Popular Vote vs. the Electoral College